data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5842/b5842a0d3e5ee0a8701f7af9d8796f95d7cb669b" alt=""
Then finally there is the personal choice, do I think Peter Parker should be gay? No. Now creating a gay superhero I have no problem with, altering Spider-Man to make him more diverse, i also have no problem with. My problem comes not from making Spider-Man gay, but Peter Parker gay. When Marvel created Miles Morales as a black Spider-Man, i had no problem with it, this wasn't them altering a pre-existing character, this was them creating an entirely new character, and I love Miles Morales, he's a fresh take on the Spider-Man story and it works without feeling cheap or pandering. If they want to make an entirely new Spider-Man who happens to be gay, i would have no problem with it. But this idea of altering your most popular character to be more diverse feels like pandering, instead of going through the effort to make a new character and make them popular, take the shortcut by changing someone that's already there. Then there's the fact that you're messing with the character traits of said character for the sake of a wider appeal, that's lazy and wrong.
With that being said, if Peter Parker does turn out to be gay in the relaunch, i'm not going to be upset, i'm not going to be writing angry rants online and i won't consider it a mass betrayal of the character, his sexuality isn't that important when it comes to defining Peter Parker i just don't think it's the right thing to do and feels more like it would be pandering to an audience that it would be to tell interesting stories with the character.
-Danny
No comments:
Post a Comment